ambulance bed bolt briefcase calendar chain chevron-left chevron-right clock-o commenting-o commenting comments diamond envelope-o envelope facebook feed flask globe group heart-o heart heartbeat hospital-o instagram leaf map-marker medkit phone quote-left quote-right skype star-o star tint trophy twitter user-md user youtube

LEE LAB

for Biological and Machine Intelligence Research

Neuronal interactions and their role in solving the stereo correspondence problem

Jason M.Samonds, Tai Sing Lee | In Vision in 3D Environments, Ed. Laurence Harris, Michael Jenkin, Cambridge University Press | 2011 | 10.1017/CBO9780511736261.007 | PDF
Binocular vision provides important information about depth to help us navigate in a three-dimensional environment and allow us to identify and manipulate 3D objects. The relative depth of any feature with respect to the fixation point can be determined by triangulating the horizontal shift, or disparity, between the images of that feature projected onto the left and right eyes. The computation is difficult because, in any given visual scene, there are many similar features, which create ambiguity in the matching of corresponding features registered by the two eyes. This is called the stereo correspondence problem. An extreme example of such ambiguity is demonstrated by Julesz's (1964) random-dot stereogram (RDS). In an RDS (Figure 7.1a), there are no distinct monocular patterns. Each dot in the left-eye image can be matched to several dots in the right-eye image. Yet when the images are fused between the two eyes, we readily perceive the hidden 3D structure.In this chapter, we will review neurophysiological data that suggest how the brain might solve this stereo correspondence problem. Early studies took a mostly bottom-up approach. An extensive amount of detailed neurophysiological work has resulted in the disparity energy model (Ohzawa et al., 1990; Prince et al., 2002). Since the disparity energy model is insufficient for solving the stereo correspondence problem on its own, recent neurophysiological studies have taken a more top-down approach by testing hypotheses generated by computational models that can improve on the disparity energy model (Menz and Freeman, 2003; Samonds et al., 2009a; Tanabe and Cumming, 2009).